Middle-ear models


1. Circuit models

1.1 Electrical-mechanical-acoustical analogies

Electrical Mechanical Acoustical
voltage force pressure
current velocity vol. velocity
resistor dashpot mesh
inductor mass tube
capacitor spring volume

Equations have same form.

1.2 Middle-ear circuit models

Block diagram of middle ear Block diagram of middle-ear model.

Applies to middle ears of most mammals.
Circuit model

Circuit model.

Note two components for eardrum.

1.3 Problems with lumped models

Lack of direct connection between parameter values and anatomical or physiological properties.

For example:

2. Finite-element method

In the finite-element method, a distributed physical system to be analysed is divided into a number (often large) of discrete elements.

The complete system may be complex and irregularly shaped, but the individual elements are easy to analyse.
Eardrum mesh

The division into elements may partly correspond to natural subdivisions of the structure.

For example, the eardrum may be divided into groups of elements corresponding to different material properties.

Most or all of the model parameters have very direct relationships to the structure and material properties of the system.

Relatively few free parameters ...

... if parameters are known a priori.

3. Eardrum model

3.1 Model parameters

Model parameters:

In this model, there are different material properties for the triangles in


3.2 Low-frequency simulation results

Qualitatively similar to experimentally observed patterns.

Mesh resolution Varying mesh resolution to decide how fine a mesh is required:


Based on maximum-displacement values, there seems to be little advantage to using a mesh resolution greater than about 15 elements/diameter.

But why not use highest resolution?
Convergence and times

Balance between required accuracy and reasonable computation time.

3.3 Higher-frequency simulation results

Natural frequencies

Undamped natural frequencies and modes of vibration.

Increasing complexity of vibration pattern with frequency.

With damping, different areas of drum have different phases.

Damped frequency response Frequency response of point on manubrium is smoother than those of points on eardrum. Note very large phase lag at high frequencies.

3.4 Insights via numerical experiments

3.4.1 Effects of parameter variations

Varying ossicular parameters Variation of ossicular stiffness and moment of inertia (with fixed axis of rotation): little effect on lowest natural frequencies.

Varying p. tensa parameters Variation of stiffness, density and thickness of pars tensa: large effects.

Varying shape parameters Variation of curvature and depth of cone: suggestion that shape is ‘optimal’.

3.4.2 Effects of asymmetry

Natural frequencies, and increasingly complicated mode shapes.

Spread of natural frequencies:
f10/f1 = 9.1

Ellipse:
f10/f1 = 6.0

Ellipse with symmetrical ‘manubrium’:
f10/f1 = 3.8

Ellipse with asymmetrical ‘manubrium’:
f10/f1 = 3.4

Cat eardrum:
f10/f1 = 2.5

Heavy damping smears the natural modes together.

3.4.3 Wave propagation

Animation: Wave propagation for point stimulus with strong anisotropy

Spread of response to point stimulus, with anisotropy.
Animation: Wave propagation for point stimulus with isotropic properties

Without strong anisotropy.
Animation: Wave propagation for pressure stimulus with strong anisotropy

Actual stimulus is a pressure.

4. Modelling of ossicles and ligaments

Ossicular vibration is not (in general) around a fixed axis.

Depends on


4.1 Bending of manubrium

Manubrial bending

Interaction between modelling and experiment.

4.2 Incus/stapes coupling

Lenticular process

4.3 More complete model


3-D displacements


BMDE-501 Modelling middle-ear mechanics

R. Funnell
Last modified: 2011-02-05 16:23:17