Middle-ear models
| Electrical | Mechanical | Acoustical |
|---|---|---|
| voltage | force | pressure |
| current | velocity | vol. velocity |
| resistor | dashpot | mesh |
| inductor | mass | tube |
| capacitor | spring | volume |
Equations have same form.
Block diagram of middle-ear model.
Applies to middle ears of most mammals.
Circuit model.
Note two components for eardrum.
Lack of direct connection between parameter values and anatomical or physiological properties.
For example:
In the finite-element method, a distributed
physical system to be analysed is divided into a number (often large)
of discrete elements.
The complete system may be complex and irregularly shaped, but
the individual elements are easy to analyse.
The division into elements may partly correspond to natural subdivisions of the structure.
For example, the eardrum may be divided into groups of elements corresponding to different material properties.
Most or all of the model parameters have very direct relationships to the structure and material properties of the system.
Relatively few free parameters ...
... if parameters are known a priori.
Model parameters:
In this model, there are different material properties for the triangles in
Qualitatively similar to experimentally observed patterns.
Varying mesh resolution to decide how fine a mesh is required:
Based on maximum-displacement values, there seems to be little advantage to using a mesh resolution greater than about 15 elements/diameter.
But why not use highest resolution?
Balance between required accuracy and
reasonable computation time.
Undamped natural frequencies and modes of vibration.
Increasing complexity of vibration pattern with frequency.
With damping, different areas of drum have different phases.
Frequency response of point on manubrium is smoother than those of points
on eardrum. Note very large phase lag at high frequencies.
Variation of ossicular stiffness and moment of inertia (with fixed
axis of rotation): little effect on lowest natural frequencies.
Variation of stiffness, density and thickness of pars tensa: large effects.
Variation of curvature and depth of cone: suggestion that shape
is ‘optimal’.
Natural frequencies, and increasingly complicated mode shapes.
Spread of natural frequencies:
f10/f1 = 9.1
Ellipse:
f10/f1 = 6.0
Ellipse with symmetrical ‘manubrium’:
f10/f1 = 3.8
Ellipse with asymmetrical ‘manubrium’:
f10/f1 = 3.4
Cat eardrum:
f10/f1 = 2.5
Heavy damping smears the natural modes together.
Spread of response to point stimulus, with anisotropy.
Without strong anisotropy.
Actual stimulus is a pressure.
Ossicular vibration is not (in general) around a fixed axis.
Depends on
Interaction between modelling and experiment.
BMDE-501
Modelling
middle-ear mechanics